Test Valley Borough Local Plan 2006
5 AVOIDING HAZARDS
Other links in the Interactive Local Plan:
5.1 Introduction
5.1.1 The Council’s intention to maintain a physically safe
environment by taking proper precautions against the risks posed
by natural and man-made hazards is expressed in the objective of
this chapter which is: To ensure that proposed development is not
at risk from natural or man-made hazards and will not cause or increase
the risk of hazards to existing development, human health or the
wider environment.
5.1.2 This chapter includes policies to take account of the risks
posed by:
- unstable land;
- flooding;
- pollution (including that posed by land contamination); and
- hazardous installations.
5.1.3 When considering proposed developments, which may be at risk
from or give rise to hazards, the Council will assess the nature
of the risk, the potential harm associated with it, and take account
of any proposed measures to reduce the overall level of risk. Where
the nature of the hazard is unknown, or poorly understood, developers
will be expected to provide sufficient information to enable the
Council to make an assessment of the risks of harm to existing development,
human health and the wider environment.
5.1.4 The regulation of development and activities that may be
at risk from, or give rise to, hazards is complex and usually involves
other statutory agencies. For example, the regulation of pollution
is largely a matter for the Environment Agency, and health and safety
issues are largely the concern of the Health and Safety Executive
(HSE). In appropriate circumstances the Council will liaise with
the relevant statutory agencies and have regard to their advice
when making planning decisions.
5.2 Unstable Land
| |
|
HAZ 01:
UNSTABLE LAND
Development that may be subject to ground instability
or potential instability will only be permitted if it can
be demonstrated that:
- the development site is stable or would be made
stable; and
- the development itself is unlikely to trigger
erosion, landsliding or subsidence within or beyond the
boundaries of the site or threaten the structural integrity
of any building on or adjoining the site.
|
5.2.1 Underground cavities, unstable slopes or land of low load-bearing
capacity can create unstable ground conditions. In these areas,
natural geological or man-made processes may trigger subsidence
or settlement. The movement that results can damage or destroy buildings
and structures and threaten public safety. Once ground movement
has occurred, an area can remain unstable for a long time and relatively
minor actions or changes in the local environment may trigger further
movements. Potential ground instability problems in Test Valley
are detailed in Figure 5.1.
| Figure 5.1: |
| Unstable Land Problems in Test Valley |
| SUBSIDENCE
Underground cavities can form where the underlying rock
is soluble (for example on chalk deposits) and the collapse
of the cavities can lead to subsidence. Sinkholes occur in
chalk areas in Test Valley due to dissolution and may become
filled with shrinkable or compressible deposits. Other causes
of subsidence include quarrying, which may destabilise slopes,
and the consolidation and decay of organic materials within
landfill sites.
SETTLEMENT
Settlement occurs through the compaction of poorly consolidated,
compressible or shrinkable soils. Peat and alluvial soils
are typically waterlogged and are liable to settling if de-watered.
New development may require deeper foundations in order to
ensure stability in such areas. Existing buildings and structures
over peat deposits could be at risk from settlement caused
by new development nearby, particularly if sub-surface water
flows are altered. This is an issue in the floodplain of the
River Test, especially in Romsey. Shrinkable clays can cause
problems of settlement particularly during (and after) prolonged
periods of drought. |
5.2.2 The Council will not permit development if it is likely to
be at risk from ground instability during its anticipated lifetime
or if it is likely to cause ground movements within or beyond the
boundaries of the development site. It is not the Council’s
intention to sterilise land unnecessarily and development may be
permitted if adequate mitigation measures can be undertaken to secure
the long-term stability of the site and surrounding areas. The Council
will use planning conditions or agreements in appropriate circumstances.
5.2.3 It is the developer's responsibility to ensure that instability
or trigger ground movements off-site will not affect proposed developments.65
Where there are reasons for suspecting instability, the developer
will be required to submit a ground stability report.
| Figure 5.2: |
| Ground Stability Reports |
| GROUND STABILITY REPORTS
In areas of potential ground instability, planning applications
for development should be accompanied by a ground stability
report prepared by a geotechnical specialist. The report should
show:
- whether the land is capable of supporting the loads imposed
over the expected lifetime of the development; and
- whether the development would threaten the continuing
stability of the landform on or adjacent to the site (for
example, through excavation, changing drainage patterns
and groundwater regimes, or changes in land use).
The assessment should be based upon: site history; site inspection;
geotechnical desk study; and / or ground investigation adequate
to reasonably assess the stability of the site. Any ground
investigation should not itself cause ground instability.
Where the ground would be potentially unstable, but the instability
could be reduced to a reasonable level by mitigation measures,
details should be provided on the type of mitigation measures
proposed. |
5.3 Flooding
| |
|
HAZ 02:
FLOODING
Development will only be permitted if it can be demonstrated,
through a Flood Risk Assessment where necessary, that:
- it would not have a significant impact on the
capacity of a floodplain to store floodwater;
- it would not impede the flow of surface floodwater
or obstruct the run-off of water due to high levels of ground
water;
- it would not significantly increase the volume
of surface water run-off entering existing water-courses;
- it would not increase the number of people or
properties at risk from flooding; and
- it incorporates flood protection and mitigation
measures to minimise its impact on the water environment
and provision is made for the long term maintenance and
management of such measures.
|
5.3.1 Development permitted without regard to the risks of surface
water or groundwater flooding can endanger life, lead to property
damage, and require expenditure on the construction and long-term
maintenance of flood protection works. Such an approach is contrary
to the principles outlined in PPG 25: Development and Flood Risk66
and it is more appropriate to avoid the need for such structures
by considering this issue at the planning application stage. An
indication of the location of floodplains in Test Valley can be
obtained from the Environment Agency’s Indicative Floodplain
Maps, which are available from the local Agency office or on the
Agency’s website (www.environment-agency.gov.uk). In these
areas, the Council will seek the advice of the Environment Agency.
It should be noted that built development, including housing would
not normally be permitted in such areas. It is therefore recommended
that for developments within or adjacent to such areas, direct discussions
are held with the Environment Agency, prior to the submission of
planning applications, to explore the implications of this issue
further.
5.3.2 The risk of flooding is not only an issue in river floodplains
but also in other locations such as sites without adequate surface
water run-off, sites where seasonal groundwater levels are such
that drainage may be difficult during winter months, or where the
natural drainage of the land is obstructed, and even on level sites
with low ground permeability. In such locations, existing development
can be at risk from flooding and new development may generate additional
flood risk problems. Outside main river floodplains development
will be permitted provided that any flooding problems can be overcome
by mitigation measures including, in appropriate locations, sustainable
drainage systems which seek to control surface water run-off as
close to its origins as possible. For example, surface water run-off
can be limited by surface water storage areas, such as ponds, subsurface
storage areas, flow limiting devices, or soakaways. The Council
will consider using planning conditions or agreements to secure
any necessary flood protection and mitigation measures and to secure
satisfactory arrangements for their long-term maintenance. Any mitigation
measures proposed will be assessed as part of the development. Where
developers intend to utilise existing ponds or watercourses to achieve
the mitigation of flood risks, the Council will expect developers
to show that there is adequate capacity in these systems to accept
any increases in surface water run-off that may be generated by
the development. The Council will also expect their character to
be preserved or maintained, as far as possible, as part of the mitigation
scheme.
5.3.3 It is the developer's responsibility to investigate and assess
the extent of risk from flooding and in appropriate circumstances
a developer will be required to submit a detailed flood risk evaluation
report.67 The Council will require
developers to carry out a detailed risk assessment where:
- The proposed development lies within a river floodplain or
an area prone to high seasonal groundwater levels;
- The size or nature of a proposed development would significantly
increase the amount of surface water run-off from the site;
- The proposed development would necessitate the culverting or
diversion of watercourses or restrict access to a watercourse;
or
- The proposed development would be liable to obstruct flood flows,
reduce the effectiveness of existing flood defence works or restrict
access to existing flood defence works.
| Figure 5.3: |
| Flood Risk Evaluation Reports |
| FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT REPORTS
A flood risk evaluation report should be prepared by a hydrological
specialist. The report should show:
- The extent and location of the floodplain in both pre
and post development phase;
- whether the development would create or exacerbate flooding
problems;
- whether the development would affect local drainage routes
and, if so, whether the drainage routes could cater for
extreme events;
The assessment should be based upon: site history; site inspection;
and / or ground investigation adequate to reasonably assess
the hydrology of the site. Details should be provided on the
type of mitigation measures proposed to overcome any potential
flooding problems, including the necessary maintenance of
any land drainage system. |
5.4 Pollution
| |
|
HAZ 03:
POLLUTION
Development which would, or could potentially give
rise to pollution, will only be permitted if it will not have
an adverse impact on adjoining uses or the natural environment,
or pose a risk to health as a result of any discharges or
emissions to water, land or air. |
5.4.1 Pollution is the release of substances into the environment,
which can cause harm to human health, property or the wider environment.
Pollution can be released into the air or water or can contaminate
land Some developments or activities have the potential to pollute
more than one environmental medium. Emissions or discharges that
are a nuisance but are not likely to prove harmful to health (such
as dust, noise or harmless odours), are dealt with in Policy AME
05.
5.4.2 The control of pollution is a complex process involving both
local planning authorities and other statutory bodies. Government
advice is that "the planning system should not be operated
so as to duplicate controls which are the statutory responsibility
of other bodies."68 The legal
position, however, is that pollution impacts are material planning
considerations which should not be ignored in the making of planning
decisions.69 Therefore the Local
Planning Authority will control the location of development which
may give rise to pollution or is in close proximity to pollution
sources.
5.4.3 The Council will take account of any material considerations
concerning potential releases of pollution and when making planning
decisions will have regard to the advice of the pollution control
agencies. In cases where land use mitigation measures are required
to prevent pollution, or to enable releases, or potential releases,
to meet pollution control standards the Council will need to be
convinced that the proposed measures will be effective. In appropriate
circumstances the Council will use planning conditions or agreements
to ensure that a development does not give rise to pollution.
5.5 Land contamination
| |
|
HAZ 04:
LAND CONTAMINATION
Development on, or immediately adjoining land known
or suspected to contain contamination, will be permitted provided
that all necessary, practicable and effective measures to
investigate and remediate the site have been agreed so as
not to:
- expose the occupiers of the development and neighbouring
land users to unacceptable risk from the contamination,
or allow such a situation to continue;
- lead to the contamination of any watercourse,
water body, groundwater, or adjoining land, or allow such
contamination to continue; or
- lead to the release of contamination to air,
or allow such releases to continue.
|
5.5.1 Past developments and processes have resulted in the contamination
of land both in urban and rural areas. Examples of contaminated
sites include; old gas works, sewage works, landfill sites, and
industrial sites. Contamination can pose a threat both to the health
of future users of the site, and to the surrounding environment,
if the contaminants escape and cause pollution. Few sites are so
badly contaminated that they cannot be reused at all, but the contamination
may require remediation and limit the range of potential future
uses
5.5.2 The Government encourages the reuse of contaminated sites,
subject to the risks to human health and the environment being adequately
dealt with. The reuse of contaminated land is in line with the principle
of sustainable development because it effectively recycles the land
and reduces pressure for the development of greenfield sites.70
In undertaking remedial works, the Government considers that a balance
needs to be struck between the need to bring the land back into
a beneficial use, and the risks and liabilities posed by the contamination.
Consequently, a "suitable for use" approach is advocated
in which the level of remedial action required should be sufficient
to overcome any unacceptable risks to health or the environment,
taking into account the actual or intended use of the site. 71
5.5.3 The Council will encourage the redevelopment of contaminated
sites, provided that this does not pose an unacceptable risk to
human health or the wider environment. The risks should be identified
early in the development process to ensure that appropriate mitigation
measures can be taken. 72 Where
it is anticipated that contamination may be present near or on a
proposed development area, a site assessment will be required to
characterise the contamination and establish the likely risks posed.
Responsibility for providing information on whether land is contaminated
rests primarily with the developer. 73
This should take the form of a “source - pathway - receptor”
assessment, whereby the sources of the hazard (for example: heavy
metal contamination), the receptors (for example: public water supply
borehole) and the pathway connecting the two (for example: contaminated
groundwater plumes) are considered. In this way the development,
including any mitigation measures, can be assessed to determine
whether the risks can be reduced to an acceptable level. In assessing
the need for mitigation, the Council will have regard to the intended
future use of the site. If mitigation measures prove necessary,
the Council will consider using planning conditions or agreements
to secure the measures needed before development starts. Applicants
would be expected to carry out an initial investigation into the
previous uses of the site, including investigating the presence
of any landfills within 250 metres of the site. The results and
conclusions of such investigations should inform the layout and
design of proposals and be submitted with applications.
5.6 Hazardous installations
| |
|
HAZ 05:
HAZARDOUS INSTALLATIONS
The development of hazardous installations or the
storage of hazardous materials will be permitted provided
that:
- the level of risk from accidents relating to
the presence of hazardous substances is considered acceptable;
and
- appropriate emergency access is provided to the
site and any areas of human activity that may potentially
be affected.
Within the consultation zone of a hazardous installation
development will be permitted provided that the development
and its users would not be subject to an unacceptable risk
from an accident. |
5.6.1 The Planning (Hazardous Substances) Regulations define certain
substances as a risk to human health, either due to their toxicity
or their reactive or explosive nature. Regulating the storage and
distribution of hazardous substances, and providing an emergency
plan procedure, can reduce the risk to people living in the vicinity
of such substances. The Council controls the storage and treatment
of hazardous substances through a system of Hazardous Substances
Consents established by the Planning (Hazardous Substances) Act
1990.
5.6.2 The Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations (S.I.1999
No.743) require the operator of an establishment or installation
where hazardous substances are present to prepare and implement
major accident prevention policies. The Regulations also require
the operator to submit a regular safety report to the Health and
Safety Executive (HSE) and the Environment Agency, to prepare an
on-site emergency plan, and to supply the County Council with information
necessary for the purpose of preparing an off-site emergency plan.
5.6.3 When considering a proposal for a new installation handling
hazardous substances, the Council will aim to minimise the potential
impact of an accident on human lives. If emergency evacuation procedures
are required, the area should be readily accessible by the emergency
services, and the level of human activity in the area should be
low The Council will take into account any risk assessment or other
advice provided by the HSE.
5.6.4 The existence of a hazardous installation is a material consideration
in determining the acceptability of development in proximity to
that installation which may be at risk from an accident involving
hazardous substances. Where hazardous installations already exist,
the HSE are responsible for notifying consultation zones around
such sites, and local authorities are required to seek the HSE's
view on the likely risks to proposed developments. 74
5.6.5 The Council will consult the HSE when development is proposed
within consultation zones around hazardous installations. When considering
proposals for development in these areas, the Council will be guided
by the HSE's views and any other relevant information that can be
used to assess the likely risks to people and property.
5.7 Safeguarding Aerodromes and Technical
Sites
| |
|
HAZ 06:
SAFEGUARDED AERODROMES AND TECHNICAL SITES
Development will be permitted within safeguarded
areas around official civil or military aerodromes and technical
sites provided that:
- It would not infringe on protected surfaces,
obscure runway approach lights or have the potential to
impair the performance of aerodrome navigation aids, radio
aids or telecommunication systems;
- It would not result in lighting which has the
potential to distract pilots;
- It would not result in an increase in the number
of birds that would cause an increased hazard to aircraft;
- it would not cause a hazard from other aviation
use; and
- In the case of wind turbines it would not cause
a hazard due to their size or electromagnetic disturbance.
|
5.7.1 The aim of this policy is to recognise that safeguarded areas
have been officially established by the Civil Aviation Authority
for airports or technical site and that under Circular 01/2003 certain
forms of development may be restricted. Any application within the
safeguarded area as designated on the proposal maps and which may
inhibit the aerodrome or technical site in any way will be subject
to consultation with the operator of the site.
5.7.2 The types of development which would require appropriate
consultation include development over 15m, 45m and 90m in height;
development involving intense lighting; developments that may attract
large numbers of birds (e.g. landfill sites); applications connected
with aviation use; and wind turbines due to there size and to their
effect on aeronautical systems. These types of proposal are subject
to the consultation requirements described in the legend to the
relevant safeguarding map.
5.7.3 Although there are no safeguarded civil aerodromes or technical
sites within the Borough the location of both Southampton Airport
and the Southampton navigational beacon are sited just outside the
boundary meaning that safeguarded areas extend into the Borough.
Any application will involve consultation with the airport or technical
site operator, or both as described in the legend on the relevant
safeguarding map. Military aerodromes and technical sites, such
as Middle Wallop, are also safeguarded and any application that
may affect these sites in the safeguarded area will require consultation
with Defence Estates. Plans of the safeguarded areas are available
at the Council Offices in Romsey and Andover.
65 para. 18, PPG14
(Annex 1) Development on Unstable Land: Landslides and Planning,
1996, DoE.
66 PPG25: Development
and Flood Risk, 2001, DTLR
67 para. 60, op. cit.
68 para. 1.3, PPG23:
Planning and Pollution Control, 1994, DoE.
69 Gateshead MBC v.
the Secretary of State for the Environment and Northumbrian Water
Group plc.
70 para. 4.1, PPG23:
Planning and Pollution Control, 1994, DoE.
71 para. 4.2, op. cit.
72 para. 4.10, op. cit.
73 The Planning (Hazardous
Substances) Regulations (S.I. 1992 No. 656), Schedule 1, 1992.
74 para. B-24, Annex
B, op. cit.
< Previous Chapter | Next
Chapter >